About Me

Name: Kari
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Nature v. Nurture in the classroom

    What makes a child who he is?  Are his intelligence and success in school due entirely to his environment?  Or do his genes play a role?  According to J.B. Watson and the environmental model; we are born as a blank slate and how we turn out is due to the environments in which we are raised (Rodgerson, 2006).  However a more realistic model takes into account the role that genes play and how the environment plays off of the base.

            As educators we are concerned with the cognitive abilities of our students as they relate to academic achievement.  In the last few decades genetic research has provided data to dispute the environmental model of development and suggests that there is a “substantial role for heredity in molding the components of intellect” (Polmin and DeFries, 62).  This provides us with a synergistic approach to school success in which genetics and environment both play a role.

            If genetics place people at a starting point of intellect, what is our role as educators, how can we provide the environment to build off of the base?  Two concepts that help are those of Competence and Action Theory.  These two theories will be applied in creating a classroom setting.

            Action theory “incorporates the idea that people influence in important ways the course of their development through choices across time” (Scarr, 2).  In other words children effect their environment, the classroom, and the teacher’s behavior, which in turn affects what type of environment and responses are projected back at the children.  This is a continuous cycle.

            Say for example that a student is placed in a normal level eighth grade English class where he is expected to read a 200 page book and then write a five paragraph essay.  The issue; he has dyslexia.  His genes have contributed to his reading difficulty.  An Action theory model based upon this situation might then look like this:

 

Academic ability <--> Poor school achievement <--> Negative attitude toward school, teacher and reading <--> Misbehaves in class and doesn’t do his homework <--> Teacher thinks he doesn’t care or is slacking and is hard on him <-->he decides he is dumb and continues to play the part…

 

            We now combine Masten’s concept of competence, which is also a continuous cycle and “refers to a pattern of effective adaptation in the environment”(2006).  Now take the child from the Action theory example and continue in the framework of competence.  He has not adapted well to his environment and has a history of incompetence and failure and his future performance looks bleak as well.  This child is not incompetent forever, instead an intervention of environment needs to be made, a classroom situation which will allow a child to “function at the growing edge of his capabilities” (Masten and Coatsworth, 206).  Instead of being in a typical English class we move the student into a more appropriate setting.

            The student’s initial capabilities, which are set by genetics, as well as his environment prior to coming to this class, are looked at.  He is placed in an English class with people of similar abilities and set the standard at a high but achievable level.  The assignment is now to read a 50 page book and write a paragraph summary, with more time allotted for the reading as well as in class support.  Because he is capable and competent at this level he now has the “track record of achievement” (Masten and Coatsworth, 206).  This achievement is now combined with the Action theory model and it looks more like this:

 

Appropriate classroom situation<--> competence <--> positive feeling toward school and teachers <--> does not act out in a negative manner <--> teacher is positive toward the student <--> he continues to achieve and advance

 

            By challenging the student at the edge of his capabilities and providing an appropriate classroom setting he will achieve better school success as well as contribute more positively, rather than negatively to his environment.  As educators we must take into consideration the role that genetics plays in a student’s success in school and then provide the appropriate environment to help a student strive and succeed.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive